District 24 2021 GNT Final Results

Posted on June 16, 2021 by Lee Lin

All four flights completed their final 48-board knockouts this past Sunday. Here are the results!

Championship: Blanchard vs Dinner

Team Blanchard won after 36 boards with a score of 82-18. For winning first in the championship flight, Robert Blanchard, Sam Lev, Fred Chang, Adam Wildavsky, and Daniel Lev will each win 48 gold points, and a blue ribbon qualifier. Runners up Bill Dinner, Jack Lipson, Bart Cirker, and Mark Leibowitz will each win 36 gold point and a blue ribbon qualifier.

You can also find the entire recap of the championship flight on ACBL Live.

Flight A: Moss vs Cable

Team Moss defeated Team Cable with a score of 136 to 79 across 48 boards. David Moss, Stephen Levine, Jacqueline Chang, and Richard Walker will each receive 40 gold points and a blue ribbon qualifier. In 2nd place, Lorraine Cable, David Yoon, Stephannie Culbertson, and Rachael Moller win 30 gold points and a blue ribbon qualifier.

Due to scheduling conflicts, Team Moss has declined to represent the district during the July national finals. Instead, the honor falls to team Cable. As usual, all teams representing the district are allowed to augment their roster to a total of 6 eligible players, as long as 3 out of the 4 original team members remain on the team. Of course, teams can also just compete with no such modifications.

See the full Flight A recap on ACBL live.

Flight B: Merlo vs Yu

The highest total IMPs knockout took place in the match between Merlo and Yu. This is somewhat expected – the two teams were playing vastly different bidding systems that easily leads to different contracts on many hands, in addition to the normal chaos that comes from a 48-board KO. The final result is 129-111 for Merlo, also the defending champions from last year. Stefano Merlo, Robert Forster, Christopher Moh, and Jordan Lampe will each win 33.5 gold point and a blue ribbon qualifier.

For Flight B, because 10 teams showed up for the opening round, the District can sent two teams to the national finals. Each member of 2nd place team Leon Yu, Qun Yang, Jimmy Wang, and Samuel Kuang will win 25.13 gold points and a blue ribbon qualifier. Together, both teams will represent District 24 in July.

See the full Flight B recap on ACBL live.

Flight C: Xing vs Wagner

The Flight C final knockouts concluded as well, with Wagner winning 99-90. As stated in a prior post, both teams will win lots of gold and red masterpoints, as well as a red ribbon qualifier.

Similar to Flight B, both teams are invited to represent the district in the national finals. It was a close call, because as the registration deadline approached, there were only 6 teams, two short of the 8 team requirement for sending a second team. However, thanks to some collaboration between the clubs, units, and district (some of you may have received more than a few notices), we managed to muster up 3 last minute teams – including Team Wagner!

See the full Flight C recap on ACBL live.

Posted in Events, Results | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Team Xing and Team Wagner to Represent District 24

Posted on June 6, 2021 by Lee Lin

Congratulations to Team Xing and Team Wagner for winning their semi-final GNT-C KO matches today. They will still compete in the finals next Sunday, along with all the other flights, to determine the district champions. Normally, the district champion includes a travel subsidy, but this year the national finals are online. Instead, the winners receive fame and glory during our next District Award ceremony, as well as extra masterpoints and potentially favorable seeding next year (not that seeding played any role this year).

Both teams will receive a red ribbon qualifier, as well as at least 15 gold / red masterpoints (20 if they win next week).

Team Xing
Henry Xing
Jiaheng Hu
Tingran Wang
Yang Xu

Team Wagner
Margot Wagner
Benjamin Weisgal
Maryann Oehlerking
Anthony Chiocchi
Damon Suden

For winning 3rd /4th place, Team Montgomery and Team Ogden will each win 10 masterpoints, half gold and half red. Team Montgomery consists of Susan Montgomery, Rachel Brannan, Leslie Ehrlich, and Joanna Greenspan. Team Ogden consists of Cynthia Ogden, Catherine Williams, Laszlo Seress, and Barbara Ullman.

Check out the Flight C semi-final boards and match results.

Posted in Events, Results | Tagged , | Leave a comment

GNT Flight A and C kicks off today!

Posted on June 5, 2021 by Lee Lin

Today we have 15 teams playing in the opening round of their GNT Flight. Fight A is a simply 6 team round robin, 5 rounds of 10 boards each. Flight C is a little more weird, and shows the limitations of online bridge technology.

Results Mid-Day

First, here is what everyone is looking for, the real-time results.

Flight A Leaderboard

Flight C Leaderboard

Online with 9 teams in the field?

Normally in face-to-face bridge, with 9 teams in the field, you could set up a rotation so that each team plays 8 rounds of 6 boards, through a coordinated movement. For example, round 1 every East-West pair moves up one table, next round every East-West pair moves down one table. After every pair of rounds, the teams can compare scores. It’s not quite the same as having 3 different 3-ways. It’s more like a massive 9-way. But the important point is, no one ever needs to sit out a round.

How did we handle it?

Unfortunately, there is no solution yet for online bridge, and perhaps we wouldn’t want one. Instead, everyone is playing the same pre-dealt hands at the same time, except that one team sits out each round, leaving the other 8 to play a quick 6-board round. It’s a little annoying that the day lasts one round longer then it needs to – and even more unfortunately that no one knows when there bye round is until the day of the match. For people with playing-time restrictions, it makes the day hard to predict. Hopefully next year we have a better solution, or we are fully back to face-to-face.

Posted in Events, Results | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

GNT 2021 Championship and B Finalists

Posted on May 28, 2021 by David Moss

Congratulations to District 24 GNT Open and Flight B finalists. They will play their final 2-session KO on Sunday, June 13th, starting at 10am.

Open – 8 teams entered. Finalists
Bill Dinner, Jack A Lipson, Bart Cirker, and Mark A Leibowitzvs 
vs
Robert Blanchard, Sam Lev, Fred C Chang, Adam Wildavsky, and Daniel Lev

Flight B – 10 teams entered. Finalists:
Stefano P Merlo, Robert B Forster, Christopher Moh, and Jordan Lampe
vs
Leon Yu, Qun Yang, Zhuo Wang, and Samuel Kuang

See links for complete weekend results:
Open: 
Round Robin
Semi Finals
Flight B
Round Robin
Semi Final

Flights A & C will be played June 5 & 6.

Pre Registration required by May 29: Bridge Winners

All rounds (2-session): 10:00 am on Bridge Base Online
Card fees will be $120 per team per day.

Flight A – 0-6000 MPs
1st Place: 40 Gold Points* 2nd Place: 30 Gold Points

Flight C – NLM < 500
1st Place: 20 Gold/Red Points* 2nd Place: 15 Gold/Red Points

Posted in Events, Results | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

GNT real-time scoreboard, B and Championship

Posted on May 22, 2021 by Lee Lin

We won’t bother to put too much spin on the results. We know what everyone wants is the real-time scoreboard, so here it is.

Championship Flight Leaderboard

Flight B Leaderboard

With 4 rounds complete in B and 3 rounds complete in Championship, we are near the halfway mark. Remember, the top four teams by Victory Points will advance to the next day.

Championship Flight Leaderboard after 3 rounds (7 total)

Flight B Leaderboard after 4 rounds (9 total)
Posted in Events, Results | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

District 24 GNT 2021 Kicks Off This Weekend!

Posted on May 20, 2021 by Lee Lin

We have 18 teams registered for the first GNT weekend, with 8 teams in the open flight and 10 teams in Flight B. Because we have crossed the required threshold, we are eligible to send two B teams to the district finals.

Also, ACBL ruled that the GNT District Finals will pay the full masterpoint amounts, not the 20% reduced amounts due to online play. Flight B first place pays 33.5 gold points, and open flight pays a ton more (not that they need more).

Prelim Schedule:

Saturday 22nd Qualifying stage

Open (8 teams). Round Robin

7 rounds of 7 boards (49) 50 min per round 10 minutes break 1 hr lunch break

1 – 10:00
2 – 11:00
3 – 12:00
4 – 13:00
Break
5 – 15:00
6 – 16:00
7 – 17:00

Flight B (10 teams). Round robin

9 rounds of 6 boards (54) 45 minutes per round 5 minutes break 1 hr lunch break

1 – 10:00
2 – 10:50
3 – 11:40
4 – 12:30
5 – 13:20
Break
6 – 15:20
7 – 16:10
8 – 17:00
9 – 17:50

Sunday 23rd Semifinals

Winner of the round robin chooses his opponent between 3rd and 4th place

2nd place plays against the team not chosen by the winner

4 segments of 12 boards, 1:25 plus 10 minutes break between segments. 1 hr break for lunch

10:00 11:35 14:00 15:35

Posted in Events | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

District 24 GNT 2021

Posted on April 15, 2021 by Lee Lin

District 24 will hold District GNT finals online. Winners in each flight will advance to the national finals, also held online, in late July 2021. Fees are $60/session per team, with all teams ensured at least one full, two-session opening round.

Registration Required on BridgeWinners:
https://bridgewinners.com/tournament/view/district-24-gnt/

All opening rounds start at 10:00am ET

FLIGHTOpening WeekendSemi-Final
(if needed)		Final
OpenMay 22 + May 23June 6June 13
Flight AJune 5   + June 6 June 13
Flight BMay 22 + May 23 June 13
Flight CJune 5   + June 6 June 13

All games played on Bridge Base Online
Questions: gnt@gnyba.org

District GNT Coordinator: Lee Lin (lee@gnyba.org)

Tournament Flyer:
https://gnyba.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/GNYBA-GNT-flyer-2021_Apr-21.pdf

See the full Conditions of Contest (some highlights below)

Special Eligibility Rules for 2021:

The event is open to teams of 4-6 players.  All players must be members in good standing of the ACBL and meet residence and flight-specific masterpoint / rank restrictions.  

For the 2020-2021 season, GNT eligibility for location, masterpoint limits, and Life Master rank are all based on August 6th, 2019 records.  In all flights, a member’s principal physical residence as of September 1st of 2019 shall establish District residency.  A player who moved between September 1, 2019 and September 1, 2020 may elect to compete in either District (but not both). New ACBL members who joined after September 1, 2020 may use their current District residency.

The Championship Flight is open to all such players, Flight A to those who had fewer than 6000 masterpoints, Flight B to those who had fewer than 2500 masterpoints, and Flight C to those who were non-life masters and had fewer than 500 masterpoints. 

A player may participate in 2 flights of the event as long there is no conflict in the initial rounds as scheduled.  However, once a team advances to the final KO phase in any flight (or semi-finals of open flight), none of the players may participate in any other flight.   For example, if a Flight B team advances past May 22nd and May 23rd into the finals on June 13th, none of the players will be allowed to join a Flight A or Flight C roster.  The team will not be allowed to forfeit their KO in order to join other flights. 

Format

a)  The First stage of the District Final will be knockouts, round robins, or swiss at the discretion of the Coordinator and the tournament Director.

b) Head to head KO ties will be broken by a six-board playoff.  Round robin or three-way KO ties will be broken per current ACBL general conditions which can be found at www.acbl.org.

c)  Round robins or swiss rounds will be scored using the USBF Victory Point charts (even though BBO software may display ACBL Victory Points).  See USBF conditions https://usbf.org/docs/COC/General%20Conditions%20of%20Contest%202019.pdf .  

d)  NUMBER OF BOARDS.    Every knockout match in the championship flight will consist of 48 boards.  For Flight A, B, & C, the final knockout match will consist of 48 boards, while earlier rounds will be 24 boards if single-session and 48 boards if two-session.  The exact format depends on the number of teams entered and will be determined by the Tournament Director using Appendix A as a guideline.

Participation Requirements

Each member of a team must play 50% of the boards per knockout match.  During the swiss or round robin stage event, each player must play in at least half the rounds, rounding down.    

If the team receives a bye for any portion of the event, then all members of the team are deemed to have participated for that portion.

Convention Charts

At the District and National Finals, the Basic Chart applies to Flight C, the Basic+ Chart applies to Flight B, the Open Chart applies to Flight A, and the Open+ Chart applies to the Championship Flight.  Players are responsible for ensuring their agreements abide by the appropriate chart.  The director-in-charge and GNT Committee may unfavorably adjust the results of any board in which a pair or team used disallowed methods, or even disqualify the offending team in extreme cases.

Arrangement of Matches and Security

a).  All rounds will be played online using Bridge Base Online, following standard ACBL conventions for swiss, round robin, or knockout matches. 

b).  The director in charge will determine required security protocols for all rounds.  For knockout rounds, players should be prepared to maintain a connection with a virtual screen mate opponent using Zoom, a live phone call, or other video chat software.   Typically, North and East are one set of screen mates, South and West are the other set. 

Masterpoint Awards

Flight C: 16.0 Gold / Red
Flight B: 26.8 Gold
Flgiht A: 32.0 Gold
Champ: 38.4 Gold

Note: Masterpoint awards assume at least 4 sessions played in the flight – if there are fewer than 4 teams, the director in charge may shorten the event. Also, masterpoint awards above represent a 20% reduction from face-to-face District GNT finals, because the event is held online and awards gold and red mastepoints, per ACBL Board of Directors motion 20S2-02.

Posted in Events | Tagged , | 4 Comments

ACBL Board of Governors Livestream NOW

Posted on April 10, 2021 by Lee Lin

Today the ACBL Board of Governors is doing its first ever remote livestream. Here is the link embedded below. Nothing TOO exciting should be discussed, but you may see several of the folks representing you.

Livestream: https://youtu.be/Mpx9FmJNBwwso
Update: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eki6IJedtho

The stream will continue for about 2 hours. As always, the Board of Governors meeting is somewhat misleading. It is not really a board, and it does not govern. It’s primarily a group designed for two-way communication between the ACBL national level and the district membership. In many ways, it most closely resembles the house of representatives, whereas the Board of Directors is the senate.

As a reminder, a lot of Board of Governors information can also be found on the ACBL website BOG section.

Brief Summary (Not official meeting minutes)

Opening remarks by Doug Couchman – thanks everyone for coming, reminds everyone on ground rules. We will also later in the meeting discuss whether Saturday evening ET is a reasonable time to hold these meetings moving forward.

Jeff Jones gave a summary and answered questions regarding online cheating procedures and their cooperation with BBO on the matter.

Georgia Heth gave an overview on why 2021 will be very different than 2020, and filled with plenty of uncertainty and opportunity.

Counsel Linda Dunn updated everyone on the outstanding lawsuit between former ACBL tournament directors Peter Marcus et al vs ACBL, regarding exempt vs non-exempt status. Should directors be paid overtime? More information about the case on BW.

Several members had questions and comments for Linda Dunn about the lawsuit about the financial implications of the lawsuit. Although not all details could be provided on the lawsuit while still in litigation, the legal fees has cost $160K beyond what was covered by insurance.

Peyton Dodson reported on the financial health of the organization. The annual audit has been concluded and financial statements posted on the ACBL website. The original budget from November 2019 projected $330K in net gaming income. After quick pivots during the beginning of the pandemic, ACBL earned $2M a month in revenue and ended the year with a net $2.2M of gaming operations. The 2021 budget is approved and projects net gains of $748K, primarily from online activity. The budget currently does not project meaningful financial impact from face-to-face play.

Doug Couchman reports on activities from the Board of Directors (that’s the Senate, not this group, remember). One large set of changes included changes to the ByLaws, which among many things reduces the 25 Districts into 13 Regions. Pertaining in particular to the Board of Governors, the 1st and 2nd Alternate positions for each districts are no longer actually alternates moving forward.

AJ Stephani answered a question about the why 1st and 2nd alternates are no longer considered necessary. However, there is a transition period for the rest of 2021. One major reason is that all Board of Governors meetings will now be on zoom, a total of 6 per year (3 general and 3 special). In the past, Board of Governors meetings were held at NABCs, but even when face-to-face bridge resumes, we will likely continue to use Zoom meetings.

[Note: For District 24, which incudes GNYBA, the District Director is David Moss, the 1st Alternate is Jeff Bayone and the 2nd Alternate is Lee Lin. There are also three other members on the board of governors in our district: Diana Schuld, Uday B Ivatury, and Silvana Morici].

A series of motioned were made and voted on by the voting members in attendance. Normally this would be done via paddles in a physical room during NABC. Today we used Zoom polls. The first motion passed agreeing with ByLaws changes for the Board of Governors.

A prior motioned discussed talking about changing the name of the Board of Governors to something more descriptive. However, we have decided to continue calling the entity the Board of Governors.

Two more motions were proposed revising changes to the way the Board of Directors and Board of Governors cooperate. Both motions failed. However, some members note a past frustration with Board of Governors motions not passing at the Board of Director level and without sufficient communication from the Board of Directors. Others notes the communication falls to the Board of Governors chair, and that the current chair has done an excellent job.

A motion was proposed to direct the Bridge Bulletin to periodically publish a list of members currently suspended, banned, or on probation. This motioned failed. Some members pointed out that the ACBL already publishes a list of members CURRENTLY under discpline (although not a historical list).

Posted in ACBL News | Tagged | 2 Comments

District Director Letter March 2021

Posted on March 23, 2021 by Lee Lin

Once again, District Director David Moss updates all of us on the latest happenings with ACBL, our unit in Greater New York, and our neighboring unit 242. In the quarterly letter, he announced the dates for our greatly revamped District GNTs, the latest with the GNYBA league, updates from the national branch of ACBL, and some important bridge milestones from those in our district.

Check out this letter and all previous letters in the District Director section.

And to save some people an extra click, the dates for GNT will be posted on the front page of gnyba.org from now through June.

Initial Rounds Open & B: May 22-23     
Initial Rounds A & C June 5-6     
Finals All Flights June 13

Posted in ACBL News, Races, Results | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

GNYBA Finals Hand Analysis

Posted on March 6, 2021 by GNYBA

In addition to providing us live entertainment and commentary during the GNYBA Final KOs, David Gurvich offered the following analysis and thoughts on some key boards. All of the boards can be found at the KO leaderboard.

For the finals of the GNYBA Winter League I had the pleasure of commenting during the match between Bianchi-Koeppel on Vugraph.  I’d like to thank Adam Grossack(nevereast00 on twitch.tv) and Ron Smith for commenting as well.  Adam handled all the technical details while producing the twitch stream.  I also want to thank David Moss and Katherine Todd for getting me to do this(not a threat). 

Segment 1, Board 10

Let’s get to the boards.  There weren’t many large swings in the set with only 3 boards of 10+ IMPs and a final tally of 61-51 over 40 boards.  Board 10 of the 1st session produced a game swing after a transfer sequence placed South on lead but I think board 11 was more interesting.

Segment 1, Board 11

Board 11 ended with a laydown slam played in 3NT and 4NT for a push.  The auction for Bianchi ended in 3NT when both North and South were conservative in evaluating the hand.  South clearly had a maximum for the minimum shown. I have sympathy for North bidding only 3NT(having seen what they open).

Koeppel had a slightly different auction but stopped in 4NT.  I feel that the more natural auction could have reached slam.  Despite having only 13 points South should accept the invite.  The AKJ10x of hearts is clearly worth more than 8 points, the club K is gold. For slam you need controls and tricks more than points and this hand supplies that.

Segment 1, Board 20

Board 20 shows how many pairs that open light have agreements to avoid getting too high.  In contrast to board 11 Bianchi gained by stopping in 2H. 9 tricks are available but the play isn’t clear and it’s nice to have an extra level for any bad guesses. The 2H rebid was alerted as limited because they play gazzilli.  South was tempted to invite but fought that off after a lengthy hesitation.  There were some questions about what gazzilli is during the match from spectators and I thought I’d give a brief explanation.

The basic idea is that all very strong openers go through 2C.  1S-1NT-2C shows either 18+ or 11-14 with 5S+4C.  Other simple rebids at the 2-level all show weaker range hands.  Hands that are in between minimum and 18 bid above 2S.  Responder bids 2D to show enough to force game opposite 18+ with other calls showing less.  I don’t recommend gazzilli unless you are willing to have some long discussions with partner about the meanings of later calls.

Segment 1, Board 13

Board 13 in the 1st set gave South an opportunity to bid the unusual 2NT after a 1H opening by East.  Double dummy 2NT is the correct call.  Partner has a double fit and 4H makes by dropping the singleton HK offside.

This is not a call that I would be brave enough to make vulnerable.  The suit quality is awful and the 2 aces provide defense. The bid also reveals everything about my shape.  Assume a normal singleton spade lead against 4H(this happened at the other table).  Declarer innocently took a heart finesse and could have been -2 had South gotten a ruff.  With a 2NT overcall declarer knows the spade lead is a singleton and that South is 55 or better in the minors.  A strong declarer would suspect that the HK is not onside when South is looking for a ruff.  We don’t want to think how bad being in 3mX might be when North is 5422.

Segment 2, Board 6

Board 6 in the 2nd set again gave South the chance to overcall 2nt and both tables took advantage.  The suit quality is excellent and opposite 3 keycards slam might have play(most of my partners beg me to be less diligent in looking for slams).  The problem with bidding 2nt here is that an uninspired partner won’t know that 4H is the right call with Jx in hearts and Kxx in clubs.  AHA! you think to yourself, I’ll bid 3H over 3C and clue partner in.  That’s exactly what happened to the Bianchi pair at one table.  Not a great success once doubling started. At the other table Lynne Koeppel passed 3C and gained 8 IMPs when her partner went -3 undoubled.

But what can we do? The risk of missing 4H or even a slam is clear.  A normal plan might be to overcall 1H and plan a 2nd call if the auction doesn’t die. 

One of my partners advocates a 4H call here, especially at favorable vulnerability. I’m not a big fan but I can’t argue against the effectiveness. The odds of getting doubled are low and there are all kinds of opportunities to gain. The opponents may bid and go for a number, you might get a club lead, partner might have 3 keycards and you are cold for slam.  Here you are likely to be -3 undoubled and would do 8 IMPs better.

Posted in Bridge Thoughts, Results | Tagged , | Leave a comment